The woman claiming Chris Brown pulled a gun on her is wanted in New York City for questioning in connection with the theft of a designer purse in a hotel, according to TMZ.
The incident could be instrumental in proving Brown’s innocence because alleged victim Baylee Curran claims that her admiration of a piece of Brown’s jewelry triggered the events that lead her to call 911. Baylee says she called 911 and accused Chris of pulling a gun on her when she says all she was doing was admiring some jewelry.
On the contrary, however, Baylee has a history of shady conduct. According to reports, she was vacationing with a few friends at The Plaza back in 2013 when they began arguing in the hotel. According to police documents, Baylee snatched a $1,000 Louis Vuitton purse from one of the girls and ran out of the hotel. The purse contained $200 in cash, as well as credit cards and a Michael Kors wallet.
Security chased Baylee, who allegedly dropped the purse but somehow fled with the contents. By the time cops arrived on the scene, Baylee was long gone. There’s a warrant of sorts — it’s called an I-Card — which will allow NYPD cops to pick her up and take her to the station for questioning, if they find her in the city.
Apparently, the incident was bad enough that the alleged purse-snatching victim got a restraining order against Baylee from an L.A. judge. Baylee’s rep tells TMZ she had no idea New York City cops wanted her for questioning. She also claims her friend was the thief … not her.
But those aren’t the only skeletons in Curran’s closet. Apparently, the 24-year-old was stripped of her Miss California crown and only served as Miss California Regional from April 1 to July 5 due to multiple allegations that were further investigated, according to Eonline.
Eonline also reports that a source close to Baylee made “racial comments” regarding African Americans. “Baylee made racial slurs to the person’s face. This person was someone very closely related with the pageant directly that she should have respected,” but wouldn’t disclose the specific comments made.
The insider adds that Curran, “was very catty with the other girls and she made girls feel uncomfortable.” And as for these photos, our source states that they “not nude, but they were risqué, which goes against a clause in the contract she signed stating that the titleholder is not allowed to take any sexually suggestive or pornographic photos.”
“There are emails, text conversations, and eyewitnesses that can confirm all of these allegations as well as the fact that the only reason why Baylee still has the sash and crown in her possession is because the organization has not been able to get in touch with her to confiscate,” the source adds. “They have contacted her several ways and several times.”
When E! News’ Ken Baker spoke with Curran, he asked about her Miss California controversy. She simply responded, “Yeah, that’s kind of another legal situation. I did see some statements that they were trying to refill my title because of nudes. I have never taken a nude photo in my life, so I don’t know if those nude photos were produced on their own. I haven’t seen anything yet.”
When asked about the racial slurs, Baylee states, “Oh, I’m not racist. I’m not racist. Nor have I ever made any racial slurs…Like I said, there are a lot of false accusations coming about at the moment.”